Changes:

Will patch: src/test/java/testsuite/regression/StatementRegressionTest.java
...
                  }
  
�[31m-             }.run();�[0m
�[32m+             }.start();�[0m
  

Description:

To fix this issue, replace the direct call to `run()` with a call to `start()`. The `start()` method initializes a new thread and then calls the `run()` method internally, ensuring that the code in `run()` executes asynchronously on a separate thread. This approach preserves the intended concurrency.

Steps:
1. Locate the erroneous line (`.run()`).
2. Replace `.run()` with `.start()` to ensure the `Thread` runs in its own thread.
3. Validate that this change aligns with the intended behavior of the code.

---


Fix is valid.

Changes:

Will patch: hutool-core/src/test/java/cn/hutool/core/io/WatchMonitorTest.java
...
  	public void testDir() {
  		monitor = WatchMonitor.createAll("d:/", new DelayWatcher(watcher, 500));
�[31m- 		monitor.run();�[0m
�[32m+ 		monitor.start();�[0m
  	}

Description:

To fix the problem, we should properly start the `WatchMonitor` instance on a new thread instead of calling its `run()` method directly. This typically involves using the `start()` method, which ensures the `run()` method executes on a separate thread as intended.

In this case, the following changes are needed:
1. Replace `monitor.run()` with `monitor.start()` in the affected test methods: `testDir` and `testDelay`.
2. No other modifications appear necessary since the `monitor` object is already correctly set up.

---


Fix is valid.
Changes:

Will patch: hutool-core/src/test/java/cn/hutool/core/io/WatchMonitorTest.java
...
  	public void testDir() {
  		monitor = WatchMonitor.createAll("d:/", new DelayWatcher(watcher, 500));
�[31m- 		monitor.run();�[0m
�[32m+ 		new Thread(monitor).start();�[0m
  	}

Description:

To fix this issue, we need to ensure that the `run()` method is called on a separate thread instead of the current thread. If `WatchMonitor` is a `Thread` or similar, then `start()` should be invoked instead of `run()`. If `WatchMonitor` is not directly a thread but implements `Runnable`, a `Thread` instance wrapping the `WatchMonitor` object should be created and started. This approach preserves the expected behavior of starting the monitoring task in a separate thread.

There are two locations in the code where this issue appears: line 68 (`monitor.run()`) and line 84 (`monitor.run()`). Both should be modified to ensure a new thread is started.

---


Fix is valid.